Webloggin » The Secret Bathroom Language of Homosexuals

I can’t remember a more bizarre story than this foot-tapping saga involving Sen. Craig. Whether he’s gay or not is not the issue. What I want to know is, since when is foot tapping a crime? Even if Sen. Craig was interested in some guy on guy action in a public restroom (an activity made popular by MTV stars), doesn’t public lewdness have to involve some sort of lewd behavior? What’s lewd about toe tapping? I don’t get it. And as a member of the heterosexual community, I have no idea what the “signals” for picking up members of the same sex are. What if I inadvertently do this at some point? What if I touch my hair in a certain way, or hum a show tune while in a public place? Can I be arrested for that?

Craig probably is a puff. The way the Republicans have been embarrassing me for years now it would be par for the course. But even so, if he is and all they got him for was toe tapping, I’m going to go out on a limb and declare this “sting” a gynormous waste of taxpayer money. I can think of 10 things off the top of my head on which our money would be better spent.

1. Starting a task force to more thoroughly screen Middle Eastern Muslim men at airports.
2. Funding a campaign to remind people why we need to screen Middle Eastern Muslim men instead of 80-year-old blue hairs.
3. Investigating the militant Muslim training camps springing up across America.
4. Closing the borders.
5. Castrating child molesters
6. Finding a solution to the poisonous junk coming out of China
7. Deporting illegal criminals
8. Teaching our children how to read (remind me to tell you later about the 5th graders I know who can’t read)
9. Buying our military even bigger bombs
10.Alerting the public to the “Secret Bathroom Language of Gays” so that more of us don’t end up in the paddy wagon because we didn’t know that wearing blue socks on a Thursday is “lewd”.

I could think of more, but I think you get the point. The weirdest part of the whole thing is the liberals salivating over Craig’s predicament. They love to point fingers and laugh when it’s a Republican being raked over the coals. What they fail to see is their own hypocrisy. I thought they loved gays! I thought they want to teach the world it’s okay to be gay? Isn’t it dangerous for them to deny Sen. Craig his right to pick up a consenting adult male in a bathroom? How did the police know he wanted to have a tryst in public? Maybe he wanted to go to his hotel. That would have been perfectly legal. Is it only okay to be gay if you’re a liberal Democrat? Have we finally found a gay guy the liberals don’t like?

According to liberals‘ “tolerant” views, they should be embracing Craig, defending his right to be gay, and asking him to lead the Washington D.C. March of the Gays (or whatever it is they do with all the giant inflatable dildos they parade down the street.) Instead, they are treating the Craig drama as a shameful event! To gays, there is nothing shameful about coming onto a strange male in a restroom. It’s called “dating”.

Bill Clinton got a hummer from a barely legal intern WHILE engaging in important business and everybody loves him to this day. They can’t get enough of him and anyone who objected to his actual and proven lewd behavior was called a prude. They’ve always been so tolerant of the vices of their own, while Republicans are notoriously opposite. The moment one of ours falls into immorality we kick him/her unceremoniously to the curb. Republicans have never been the party to suffer from the hypocrisy affliction. For all the real hypocrites, look to the left.

[Discuss this article with Little Fox over at The Intolerant Fox...]