Webloggin » Kerry Against Kyoto before he was for it, Still a Traitor

It was bad enough that John Kerry came home from Vietnam and protested against the war while still an officer in the Naval Reserve. He also went to Paris and met with representatives of our enemy, a task he had no authority to engage in. Kerry took the side of the enemy and his words inspired them. These are acts of treason. Yet, this country allows this pompous ass to serve in the Senate instead of charging him with his crimes.

It seems that Kerry has not changed. At the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland Kerry bashed this country and blamed President Bush for every problem. He said that we had become sort of an international pariah. He said this a few feet from Mohammad Khatami, the former President of the Iranian terror state. So once again Kerry is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Just as the very aged Jane Fonda could not resist a protest, Kerry can not resist treason. In his desire to bash Bush, he was once again, incorrect. As KX points out, Kerry blamed things on Bush that Clinton was responsible for:

Kerry said the Bush administration has failed in addressing a number of foreign policy issues.

“When we walk away from global warming, Kyoto, when we are irresponsibly slow in moving toward AIDS in Africa, when we don’t advance and live up to our own rhetoric and standards, we set a terrible message of duplicity and hypocrisy,” KX Net

As is the norm for John Kerry, as soon as he opened his mouth he inserted his foot all the way to his ankle. It was Clinton who did not send the treaty for ratification. The Senate had a 95-0 vote (5 abstained) on what was the Byrd-Hagel Resolution. The Senate recommendation was that the US should not be a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol. Snap, looks like the Senate did this long before Bush was President (while hero Bubba was there) and in a double snap Kerry voted which means he voted NOT to ratify Kyoto. The Bush administration has just continued in that path and will not recommend ratification based on the exemption for China and the potential impact on the US economy.