Democrats Surrender in Spanish, Clinton Says Republicans Tried To Criminalize Jesus Christ

Yup, the Democrats held the nation’s first ever Spanish Language debate and two topics were on the top of the agenda, immigration and surrender.

As expected the Democrats pandered to immigrants with ridiculous anecdotes and catch phrases that would only work in selective audiences.

For instance, Hillary Clinton has found religion again. There is no word if she fell into her black southern evangelical accent when she hit the pulpit with the silly allusion that Republicans tried to criminalize Jesus Christ with the latest immigration bill. (You know the bill, the one that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi eulogized with a promise to resurrect it down the road).

Clinton criticized the immigration bill proposed in the last Congress, dominated by Republicans. That legislation would have penalized those who help illegal immigrants. “I said it would have criminalized the good Samaritan. It would have criminalized Jesus Christ,” she said. (src. Yahoo News)

Shut the hell up. Don’t start talking about criminalizing Jesus Christ when Democrats have been the party that has already criminalized him and every other religious covenant tied to Christianity and Judaism. Try wrapping a schoolbook in religious based book covers, praying to God in school, setting up a nativity scene in town over Christmas or having a statue of the ten commandments in a court building. Democrats have shut down all of this and more. Of course libs will be the first in line at the foot bath but that is a different story altogether. But now Hillary has religion, she needs it and her transparency is apparent.

This is why Hillary Clinton is the most dangerous person in America. Not only is she a liar who uses criminal fundraisers from foreign countries to fund her campaigns, she will even stoop as low as pretending to give a crap about Jesus Christ. I’m sure she gave the same Jesus Christ speech to the pro-abortion rallies at planned parenthood and NOW. Not.

The AP also sticks true to its policy of hiring idiots without a clue by completely missing the point that Democrats supported the immigration bill up to the very end. It was Republicans who derailed it. But that is the AP for you. What a bunch of dolts.

Pandering to Latinos was not limited to courting Mexican immigrants though. Senator Dodd is looking to help out Castro in a statement that was sure to have Danny Glover standing on the couch and clapping.

Dodd, who served in the Peace Corps in the Dominican Republic, also speaks Spanish fluently. He called for more U.S. engagement with Latin America, including a lifting of the trade embargo against Cuba.

“We’re allowing a Hugo Chavez to win a public relations effort in Latin America because we don’t invest enough in Latin America,” he said.

Yeah, we should invest more in countries that want to undermine the economy of the United States and fill high school parking lots with drugs. While we are at it lets invest more money in Venezuela so Chavez can use it in his various partnerships with Iran and Russia. Great idea.

Kucinich proved once again that he will say anything to get elected, a Democrat trait, as he says we should make Spanish our second national language!

What would a Democrat debate be if they didn’t discuss surrender. This is truly a historic moment as Democrats formally put their anti-war rhetoric to a foreign language. The Democrat strategy on the Petraeus report was hinted at by anti-military Senator John Kerry in a post on the Huffington Post last week.

Look, I know from experience that there’s no such thing as a military solution to a situation like this, and no amount of “metrics” can create one.

This statement is now a canned line for Democrats who can’t think on their own and parrot each other with key phrases in an effort to bamboozle the inattentive everyday voter, their assumed idiot du jour.

Hillary Clinton, no less creative in original thought than my pet turtle whipped out the same line for the immigrant voter.

Hillary Rodham Clinton said nothing in the report will change the basic problem that there is no military solution in Iraq. “We need to quit refereeing their civil war and bring our troops home as soon as possible,” she said.

John Edwards repackaged and regurgitated the Chuck Schumer slime on General Petraeus by calling into question his ability to be objective. Watch the silky pony allude to a Vietnam style strategy to defund the war.

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards said he is concerned the Petraeus report “will be basically a sales job by the White House, that it’ll be a PR document.” He said Congress should use its power to fund the war to insist on a withdrawal timetable.

Get that “fund the war to insist on a withdrawal timetable”? Never trust a slick backed trial lawyer who can’t even speak simple phrases without prettying them up with ineloquent circular jargon. Just say it, DEFUND THE WAR. If you want jargon we could add to what he was saying to the troops, you aren’t capable, your effort was for nothing, a genocide in Iraq is irrelevant, al-Qaeda is better than us.

The rest of the crowd went down the same path.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson retorted that Clinton and others who want to leave residual forces in Iraq would leave soldiers at risk.

“I’d bring them all home within six to eight months,” Richardson said. “There is a basic difference between all of us here … This is a fundamental issue.”

Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich was loudly applauded for saying he would pull troops out of Iraq immediately. Illinois Sen. Barack Obama aligned himself with Kucinich.

“I was a strong opponent of the war, as Dennis was,” Obama said, adding that President Bush is trying to make it appear that the 35,000 troop surge earlier this year has had an impact.

I have a question. Why did Democrats vote to approve the surge if they never intended to follow the recommendations of General Petraeus, let alone wait for his report to get out? Are Democrats so gutless and hungry for power that they would vote to keep the troops in harms way without one iota of support in an effort to appeal to an anti-war base?

The answer is yes, yes, yes.

No matter what the language Democrats can’t hide their stripes. This crowd is as unappealing as one can get. That won’t stop Hollwood, Oprah Winfrey or the mainstream media from dressing them up to look as patriotic and inviting as possible. The only problem is that they keep on speaking. The more they do that the less there is to believe.

See also: Michelle Malkin