Webloggin » Condoms for Pre-Schoolers

Well, okay, maybe I’m exaggerating a little, but one day soon the public schools are going to be handing out condoms to 3-year-olds. I’m making that prediction now so mark it down.

A middle school in Portland is going to offer full contraceptive services to 6th graders.

11-year-olds, People.

Not only does this include condoms, but the pill as well and all without parental notification. I highly doubt they will be notifying your child’s physician either, which may be important in finding out if the child isn’t a good candidate for the pill…heart conditions anyone?

If you still think it’s a good idea to send your kids to public school just read this article. It is staggering to me that educators argue that 11-year-olds need “birth control” more than they need good reasons to be celibate. There isn’t one good thing that can come from juvenile sex. Not one. I’ve never heard any of these condom-pushers name one positive that comes with pre-teen sex. All they care about is their liberal agenda; creating more liberal voters. If they can get teens pregnant (a.k.a. welfare mammas) they can keep them on the Democratic voting roster forever…and THAT’S what it comes down to. They don’t care about your child. They care about advancing their political agenda. They are TRYING to get your children pregnant. It’s not about keeping them from getting pregnant. If it were, they wouldn’t balk so hard at abstinence education, the only 100% effective birth control method.

This epiphany has avoided me for years as I asked, baffled, “How can they condone this? How can they push sex onto children?” And now I see the dirty truth. They’re slimy, political hacks who care nothing for your children and everything for their cause. It’s sick. Keep your children away from these users. They might as well be drug-pushers. In fact, while they’re at it, why don’t they supply your 11-year-old with needles and instruction manuals on how to shoot up safely….just in case. It’s the same thing.

I know I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again. Why do liberals advocate “safe” sex but take a no-tolerance policy on teens and alcohol? Both are equally dangerous activities for teens. But I think I’ve finally figured it out! Drunks don’t have a preferred party. You’ll find lots of them on either side of the political divide. But once you’ve lured a girl into an abortion, she’s a Democrat for life because she has to assuage the guilt forever. (And which party does that for her?)

I know I’m onto something here.

[Discuss this article with Little Fox over at The Intolerant Fox...]