Comments on: CNN Loses Control of Debate CNN USES APPARENT CLINTON PLANT IN REPUBLICAN DEBATE - Openly Gay Retired General Chastises and Rebuts Candidates from Audience http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/ News and Commentary on Politics, Media and Culture Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:27:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: irtexas http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148531 irtexas Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:45:10 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148531 Editor, They just keep doing all of their low life things that they think will harm the repubs. Why? Because they aren't smart enough to get the big picture. The sheeple at least some of them may wake up. I don't hold out a lot of hope though. If the republicans did a trick like this they would be roasted. I just hope enough of them realize just what the Hitlerbeast is before it is to late. They are all just pathetic. Hitlery will do anything to get elected. Anyone close enough to her should hire extra security. Editor,

They just keep doing all of their low life things that they think will harm the repubs. Why? Because they aren’t smart enough to get the big picture. The sheeple at least some of them may wake up. I don’t hold out a lot of hope though. If the republicans did a trick like this they would be roasted.

I just hope enough of them realize just what the Hitlerbeast is before it is to late. They are all just pathetic. Hitlery will do anything to get elected. Anyone close enough to her should hire extra security.

]]> By: Rosemary's Thoughts http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148514 Rosemary's Thoughts Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:26:23 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148514 <strong>Clinton shows fear...</strong> It isn't bad enough that the dead news stations know we don't trust them, but then they have to go out of their way to prove why.... Clinton shows fear…

It isn’t bad enough that the dead news stations know we don’t trust them, but then they have to go out of their way to prove why….

]]> By: Rosemary http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148512 Rosemary Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:11:31 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148512 Great post. It shows that we are the grown-ups. How? When the press goes after Hillary (yeah, right!), she will just say she has no control over what everyone does or else she will say it was a wonderful question. This way when we sneak into their next debate, hehehe. No. Can't do that. (Wouldn't want to, actually.) At least our side answers questions from plants. They don't even allow free speech to ask the questions that are on their minds. Great post. It shows that we are the grown-ups. How? When the press goes after Hillary (yeah, right!), she will just say she has no control over what everyone does or else she will say it was a wonderful question. This way when we sneak into their next debate, hehehe. No. Can’t do that. (Wouldn’t want to, actually.) At least our side answers questions from plants. They don’t even allow free speech to ask the questions that are on their minds.

]]> By: the Webloggin Editor http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148509 the Webloggin Editor Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:58:05 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148509 Hi Haggs, No problem. I have no issue with anybody, gay, straight or otherwise. My problem is with the gay lobby and the Democrat games with the issue. If Democrats were really open to changing the policy it would have been changed years ago. It's a wedge issue and the policy is what it is so they can keep it one. The media of course is party to this. Hi Haggs,

No problem. I have no issue with anybody, gay, straight or otherwise. My problem is with the gay lobby and the Democrat games with the issue. If Democrats were really open to changing the policy it would have been changed years ago.

It’s a wedge issue and the policy is what it is so they can keep it one. The media of course is party to this.

]]> By: Haggs http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148508 Haggs Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:45:58 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148508 I might have misread your post. The second sentence I quoted was a question when I thought it was a statement of your opinion. I appologize. I might have misread your post. The second sentence I quoted was a question when I thought it was a statement of your opinion. I appologize.

]]> By: Haggs http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148507 Haggs Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:43:46 +0000 http://www.webloggin.com/cnn-idiots-lose-control-of-debate-openly-gay-retired-general-chastises-and-rebuts-candidates-from-audience/#comment-148507 "What does openly gay mean? Does it mean sex in the barracks, should we have a gay barracks, do we allow holding hands in formation or just flirting with another soldier in boot camp?" I'm sorry, but that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You're opinion of gay men and women must be really low if you believe that. I mean, what makes you think that openly gay soldiers would lose all sense of decorum? Heterosexual soldiers seem to get along fine working with soldiers of the opposite sex. You seem to think that allowing gay men and women into the military would throw out every other code of conduct they have. They'll still have the standards that tell soldiers how to conduct themselves. You might have some who break those rules, but the military seems capable of handling the heterosexual soldiers who break the rules. I still have yet to see a common sense reason why gay Americans are not allowed to openly serve our country if they want to. “What does openly gay mean? Does it mean sex in the barracks, should we have a gay barracks, do we allow holding hands in formation or just flirting with another soldier in boot camp?”

I’m sorry, but that’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. You’re opinion of gay men and women must be really low if you believe that.

I mean, what makes you think that openly gay soldiers would lose all sense of decorum? Heterosexual soldiers seem to get along fine working with soldiers of the opposite sex. You seem to think that allowing gay men and women into the military would throw out every other code of conduct they have. They’ll still have the standards that tell soldiers how to conduct themselves.

You might have some who break those rules, but the military seems capable of handling the heterosexual soldiers who break the rules.

I still have yet to see a common sense reason why gay Americans are not allowed to openly serve our country if they want to.

]]>