CNN Loses Control of Debate CNN USES APPARENT CLINTON PLANT IN REPUBLICAN DEBATE - Openly Gay Retired General Chastises and Rebuts Candidates from Audience
Terry Trippany on Nov 28 2007 at 9:33 pm | Filed under: Election 2008
UPDATE III - CNN Admits That Keith Kerr is an Activist Member of Clinton for President LGBT Steering Committee - Another cheap Clinton trick? CNN uses member of “LGBT Americans for Hillary” to pose question to Republicans in debate.

Screen Shot of Clinton Press Release - Link Here
UPDATE II- Verified, Brigadier General Keith Kerr is a member of Hillary Clinton’s LGBT Americans For Hillary Steering Committee. So the non-partisan idiots at CNN allowed a Clinton plant to not only present a question to the Republicans but actually allowed him to debate the candidates.
UPDATE: Bill Bennet on CNN says that the openly gay Brigadier General Keith Kerr was on Hillary Clinton’s gay steering committee. Anderson Cooper admits that the General is an activist.
What bullshit, not because of the question or the topic. The crappy part of the CNN Republican You Tube Debate is that neither CNN nor any other MSM outlet would let an audience member debate or rebut Democrat candidates from the audience. In case you missed it CNN rolled out an openly gay retired Army Brigadier General who served for 43 years. “I want to know why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians?” Anderson Cooper handed the question back to the you tube presenter after the candidates answered his question (the person just happened to be in the audience). “Did they answer the question sufficiently for you?” Cooper asked. Of course he answered no and proceeded to put on an act. Knowing that he works for Hillary Clinton puts some more perspective on the ruse. It appears that he may have been a plant. It’s pretty clear that he somehow magically made his way to the front line at CNN. Of course CNN will play stupid (which of course is closer to the truth than they will admit).
“I want to know why you think that American men and women in uniform
are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians?”
First of all it’s a leading question. This isn’t a question of being “professional” enough, it’s a question of conduct, morale and management. The military is hard enough to manage and you don’t need to add an openly gay policy to make it that much harder. A majority of the personnel in the military as well as American society are non-gay. Sorry. It’s not prejudicial, this is just a fact. What are we asking here? What does openly gay mean? Does it mean sex in the barracks, should we have a gay barracks, do we allow holding hands in formation or just flirting with another soldier in boot camp? None of that behavior would be acceptable for heterosexual people and it isn’t acceptable for gays in the military, bottom line. It’s a two way street of course. The military is a place to serve and protect. Forcing the liberal concept of sexual discrimination down the throats of people who are more concerned with staying alive than the political machinations of Democrats and the media who want to use it as a wedge issue should simply be brushed aside.
As far as the gay general goes I note that he managed to have a very long and lucrative career despite “don’t ask don’t tell” as well as policies that came before that. Thumbs down to Romney for avoiding the question on his flip flop, thumbs up to Huckabee and Hunter for trying to answer the loaded question. Unfortunately thumbs down to the answers themselves which were too weak. Why can’t Duncan Hunter say gay? Homo-sex-u-al just sounds stupid in this context. Try it. Gay. And what’s up with the stock cohesion answer? Say it like it is. It’s not a matter of discrimination or cohesion. It’s a matter of managing the troops in the way the military sees fit in a way that minimizes distraction. Pretty simple.
The other aspect of just how crappy CNN is as a media outlet can be seen in the choice of questions. Not that they are different than any other media outlet, but have you noticed that victims presented to Democrats in these debates are uniquely in the position to be helped by Democrats (at least in the imagination of weak minded liberals) and victims presented to Republicans in these debates are uniquely self identified as victims of Republican policies? Just for once I’d like to have a candidate say “eat me”. That would get my vote. Stand up to these idiots. Don’t be afraid of them.
Thumbs way up to Republicans for walking into unfriendly waters while Democrats cower from Fox News and its conservative audience.
See also Michelle Malkin, The Moderate Voice, Hot Air
Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Duncan Hunter, Huckabee, Ron Paul, Fred Thompson, Tom Tancredo
Bill Bennet, CNN, Brigadier General Keith Kerr, Hillary Clinton, gay, Anderson Cooper, CNN Republican You Tube Debate, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Duncan Hunter, Huckabee, Ron Paul, Fred Thompson, Tom Tancredo
Sphere: Related Content6 Responses to “CNN Loses Control of Debate CNN USES APPARENT CLINTON PLANT IN REPUBLICAN DEBATE - Openly Gay Retired General Chastises and Rebuts Candidates from Audience”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.








“What does openly gay mean? Does it mean sex in the barracks, should we have a gay barracks, do we allow holding hands in formation or just flirting with another soldier in boot camp?”
I’m sorry, but that’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. You’re opinion of gay men and women must be really low if you believe that.
I mean, what makes you think that openly gay soldiers would lose all sense of decorum? Heterosexual soldiers seem to get along fine working with soldiers of the opposite sex. You seem to think that allowing gay men and women into the military would throw out every other code of conduct they have. They’ll still have the standards that tell soldiers how to conduct themselves.
You might have some who break those rules, but the military seems capable of handling the heterosexual soldiers who break the rules.
I still have yet to see a common sense reason why gay Americans are not allowed to openly serve our country if they want to.
I might have misread your post. The second sentence I quoted was a question when I thought it was a statement of your opinion. I appologize.
Hi Haggs,
No problem. I have no issue with anybody, gay, straight or otherwise. My problem is with the gay lobby and the Democrat games with the issue. If Democrats were really open to changing the policy it would have been changed years ago.
It’s a wedge issue and the policy is what it is so they can keep it one. The media of course is party to this.
Great post. It shows that we are the grown-ups. How? When the press goes after Hillary (yeah, right!), she will just say she has no control over what everyone does or else she will say it was a wonderful question. This way when we sneak into their next debate, hehehe. No. Can’t do that. (Wouldn’t want to, actually.) At least our side answers questions from plants. They don’t even allow free speech to ask the questions that are on their minds.
Clinton shows fear…
It isn’t bad enough that the dead news stations know we don’t trust them, but then they have to go out of their way to prove why….
Editor,
They just keep doing all of their low life things that they think will harm the repubs. Why? Because they aren’t smart enough to get the big picture. The sheeple at least some of them may wake up. I don’t hold out a lot of hope though. If the republicans did a trick like this they would be roasted.
I just hope enough of them realize just what the Hitlerbeast is before it is to late. They are all just pathetic. Hitlery will do anything to get elected. Anyone close enough to her should hire extra security.