<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Deletes Clinton - Wallace Vids from Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/</link>
	<description>News and Commentary on Politics, Media and Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Webloggin Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>the Webloggin Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think this backs up my belief that there were so many of them out there that YouTube and Fox came to the agreement that they would use Fox and Clinton as search terms. I don't think that the admins at YouTube could possibly go through all of the videos manually.

It would imply that the ones that are still up are either there with permission from fox (doubtful) or there illegally. 

I am not sure where Fox is going to go with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think this backs up my belief that there were so many of them out there that YouTube and Fox came to the agreement that they would use Fox and Clinton as search terms. I don&#8217;t think that the admins at YouTube could possibly go through all of the videos manually.</p>
<p>It would imply that the ones that are still up are either there with permission from fox (doubtful) or there illegally. </p>
<p>I am not sure where Fox is going to go with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GsimmonsSC</title>
		<link>http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>GsimmonsSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>There's one still out there as of this morning, which I had linked to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYNI5RPOlp4

I wonder how long before it disappears...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one still out there as of this morning, which I had linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYNI5RPOlp4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYNI5RPOlp4</a></p>
<p>I wonder how long before it disappears&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsUnderestimated</title>
		<link>http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>MsUnderestimated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Yep.. you're right! I went to my video that had gotten almost 100,000 hits. Here's the message:

"This video has been removed at the request of copyright owner Fox News Network, LLC because its content was used without permission"

Hmmmm... well, crap. 

Ms. U</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.. you&#8217;re right! I went to my video that had gotten almost 100,000 hits. Here&#8217;s the message:</p>
<p>&#8220;This video has been removed at the request of copyright owner Fox News Network, LLC because its content was used without permission&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230; well, crap. </p>
<p>Ms. U</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 186k Per Second - Stuff Happens Real Fast &#187; Clinton &#38; Wallace Taken Off YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>186k Per Second - Stuff Happens Real Fast &#187; Clinton &#38; Wallace Taken Off YouTube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webloggin.com/clinton-videos-removed-from-youtube-future-of-video-blogging-on-politics-in-question/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>[...] Clinton &#38; Wallace Taken Off YouTube   By kpers186k All Clinton - Chris Wallace/Fox News interview clips have been removed from youtube according to weblogin.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clinton &#38; Wallace Taken Off YouTube   By kpers186k All Clinton - Chris Wallace/Fox News interview clips have been removed from youtube according to weblogin.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
