Webloggin » Attention Mr. Giuliani

Rudy Giuliani was interviewed recently and he stuck by his belief that the government should pay for some abortions. Giuliani is running for President of the US as a Republican but there is no way in hell he is a Conservative. He is as liberal as they come, a RINO as it were. I will in no way endorse or vote for this guy. I will give my vote to a third party candidate before I vote for this putz. Here is what Giuliani said:

“Ultimately, it’s a constitutional right, and therefore if it’s a constitutional right, ultimately, even if you do it on a state by state basis, you have to make sure people are protected,” Giuliani said in an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash in Florida’s capital city. CNN

First of all abortion is not a Constitutional right. I defy Giuliani or any one else to find the word abortion in the Constitution. Granted, the SCOTUS has somehow found the word abortion in there and declared that a woman has the right to murder her unborn child. Even if this is true, where does it indicate that our taxpayer dollars have to pay for the damned thing? If the SCOTUS declares they are legal then if a woman wants one she should have to pay for it, end of story. Giuliani can’t get this through the mush he calls a brain and I know I am wasting my time but I want to address a real Constitutional issue, one Giuliani thinks should be taken away.

Giuliani believes in gun control (though I am sure he is protected by armed guards) and he wants to restrict gun ownership. He foolishly believes that taking guns away from people who obey the law will somehow make criminals comply as well. Rudy, let’s get one thing straight. The Constitution of the US specifically mentions arms and protects the right of people to keep and bear them. Notice the Constitution does not give the right, it acknowledges that the right already exists and that it shall not be infringed. The gun grabbers can debate the militia issue all they want but they need look no further than what the founders wrote about the subject to see that they meant everyone when they said people. The meaning of people in this amendment is the same as in all the others.

Rudy Giuliani can not understand that. He would rather pander to women’s groups about a right that is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution than address one that is specifically mentioned. Giuliani is a liberal and he plays the same game as all the other liberals in that he picks and chooses which part of the Constitution he wants to apply and he ignores other parts for the sake of convenience.

Giuliani does not have a chance in hell with Conservatives. He is pandering for part of the Hillary/Obama (and they will be a ticket) vote by appealing to the liberals on their founding tenet of abortion. He is also playing up to their disregard for the Second Amendment. Rudy, I want you to explain to the voters how you can support abortion as a Constitutional right that the taxpayer should pay for and disregard the right to keep and bear arms which is specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

I’ll be waiting for you to reply.

[Discuss this post over at the Big Dog's...]